Does rule 103.4.b about 'Subject to Domain Identity if applicable' indicate that future sets will include battlefields with domain?
verified
Answer
Ruling: Yes, the rule language suggests that battlefields with domain are likely planned for future sets.
Nuances:
- The rule exists even though no current battlefields have domain, indicating forward compatibility
Does this answer look correct?
0
Comments (0)
No comments yet.
Log in to comment.
Open Proposals (0)
No pending proposals.
Log in to propose edits.