As a head judge, what is the process when there's a scorekeeping discrepancy and players cannot accurately determine the proper game score?

Ruling: The head judge must investigate by asking questions to both players, reviewing their written score notes, and having players narrate the game to determine what the correct score should be. The judge then sets the game to the score that seems closest to reality based on all collected information and tells players to continue.

Sequence:

• Review both players' written score notes to identify where the discrepancy occurred
• Question both players and have them narrate the game to account for points scored
• If players agree on a mistake, resolve accordingly
• If players cannot agree, the head judge determines the score based on all information collected and what seems closest to reality
• Set the game to that score and continue play

Nuances:

• Both players are required to keep track of the score; if only one player has notes, those are the primary reference
• You can only go back to award a missed point if it was within the same round of turns
• At high OPL (Summoner Skirmish), score must be tracked in writing, not with dice/tokens
• Players should mark their opponent's points to prevent discrepancies
• Intentionally omitting an opponent's point is a possible case of cheating